{"id":6678,"date":"2026-07-30T05:52:02","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T05:52:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/?p=6678"},"modified":"2026-07-30T05:52:02","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T05:52:02","slug":"mental-disorder-alone-cannot-be-a-ground-for-divorce-under-hindu-marriage-act-jharkhand-hc-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/?p=6678","title":{"rendered":"Mental disorder alone cannot be a ground for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act, Jharkhand HC rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"e9jwa\">\n<div class=\"vdo_embedd\">\n<div class=\"GfdvZ\">\n<section class=\"_bIDB  clearfix id-r-component leadmedia undefined undefined  E9tg9 \" style=\"top:0px\">\n<div class=\"_bIDB\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">\n<div class=\"ypVvZ\">\n<div class=\"WGttI\"><img src=\"https:\/\/static.toiimg.com\/thumb\/msid-132727660,imgsize-84475,width-400,height-225,resizemode-4\/132727660.jpg\" alt=\"Mental disorder alone cannot be a ground for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act, Jharkhand HC rules\" title=\"AI generated image used for representational purpose\" decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"Ta7d_ img_cptn\"><span title=\"AI generated image used for representational purpose\">AI generated image used for representational purpose<\/span><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>NEW DELHI: The Jharkhand high court has ruled that the mere existence of a mental disorder cannot be a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. The court held that a spouse seeking divorce must prove not only the existence of the illness but also that it is of such a nature and extent that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"2\"\/>The bench made the observation on July 23 while dismissing a husband&#8217;s appeal against a family court order refusing to dissolve his marriage on the grounds of his wife&#8217;s alleged mental illness and cruelty.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"4\"\/><span class=\"strong\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">What was the dispute about<\/span><span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"6\"\/>According to the court order, the couple got married in June 2017. The husband later approached the family court seeking divorce, claiming that on the very first night after the wedding he discovered that his wife was suffering from a chronic mental disorder, allegedly which her family did not informed before the marriage. <!-- -->He further claimed that her behavior amounted to mental cruelty.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"11\"\/>However, wife denied all the allegations. She alleged that she had never suffered from any mental illness and instead claimed that she was harassed over dowry demands, including the demand for a four-wheeler vehicle. She told the court that she was willing to continue the marriage.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"13\"\/>The family court rejected the husband&#8217;s plea, following which he approached the high court.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"16\"\/><span class=\"strong\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">Why did the high court reject the husband&#8217;s appeal?<\/span><span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"18\"\/>The division bench of <span class=\"strong\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad <\/span>and <span class=\"strong\" data-ua-type=\"1\" onclick=\"stpPgtnAndPrvntDefault(event)\">Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava <\/span>held that the husband had failed to produce any medical evidence, expert testimony or documentary proof to establish that his wife was suffering from a mental disorder of such a nature that he cant live with her. The court also found that the allegations of cruelty were not supported by any evidence.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"25\"\/>&#8220;Section 13(1)(iii) of the act does not make a mere existence of a mental disorder of any degree sufficient in law to justify the dissolution of marriage,&#8221; the bench said.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"27\"\/>&#8220;Significantly, the petitioner\/husband has not examined any medical practitioner or jurist to prove the alleged mental illness of the respondent\/wife. There is no medical evidence on record to substantiate the allegation. No document has been produced by the appellant\/petitioner to support his case,&#8221; it further added.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"31\"\/>The court also noted that merely alleging that the wife is suffering from health related problems is not a ground for divorce in law.<span class=\"id-r-component br\" data-pos=\"33\"\/>The bench also agreed with the family court that the husband had failed to establish cruelty or prove that his wife had been suffering from a mental disorder within the meaning of the Hindu Marriage Act. Finding no infirmity in the family court&#8217;s judgment, the high court dismissed the husband&#8217;s appeal and upheld the refusal to grant divorce.<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/legal\/news\/mental-disorder-alone-cannot-be-a-ground-for-divorce-under-hindu-marriage-act-jharkhand-hc-rules\/articleshow\/132727595.cms\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AI generated image used for representational purpose NEW DELHI: The Jharkhand high court has ruled that the mere existence of a mental disorder cannot be a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. The court held that a spouse seeking divorce must prove not only the existence of the illness but also that it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6679,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-31"],"magazineBlocksPostFeaturedMedia":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","medium":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","medium_large":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","large":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","1536x1536":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","2048x2048":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-small":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-small-tall":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-small-square":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-small-masonry":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-medium":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-medium-masonry":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-large":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg","blogsy-wide":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg"},"magazineBlocksPostAuthor":{"name":"admin","avatar":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8709732a479614e7a8aa24d3eb1b239f30dc6d90c61464ed495001e7a469d856?s=96&d=mm&r=g"},"magazineBlocksPostCommentsNumber":"0","magazineBlocksPostExcerpt":"AI generated image used for representational purpose NEW DELHI: The Jharkhand high court has ruled that the mere existence of a mental disorder cannot be a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. The court held that a spouse seeking divorce must prove not only the existence of the illness but also that it [&hellip;]","magazineBlocksPostCategories":["\u0b26\u0b47\u0b36 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b26\u0b47\u0b36"],"magazineBlocksPostViewCount":1,"magazineBlocksPostReadTime":3,"magazine_blocks_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg",400,225,false],"medium":["https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg",300,169,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/132727660.jpg",150,84,false]},"magazine_blocks_author":{"display_name":"admin","author_link":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/author\/admin"},"magazine_blocks_comment":0,"magazine_blocks_author_image":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8709732a479614e7a8aa24d3eb1b239f30dc6d90c61464ed495001e7a469d856?s=96&d=mm&r=g","magazine_blocks_category":"<a href=\"#\" class=\"category-link category-link-31\">\u0b26\u0b47\u0b36 \u0b2c\u0b3f\u0b26\u0b47\u0b36<\/a>","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6678","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6678"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6678\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6678"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6678"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/koshalsambada.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6678"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}